Comments from the Thesis Defense
More spectrum of the insight in the research
The research part of my thesis defense presentation was structured to make my main argument, which is technology is a opportunity in child cognitive development. I present the representative reaction toward a current state of the relationship between a child and technology from 3 stockholders: designer, educators, parents. The comment was to show audiences multiple reactions instead on one representative option. I would like reshape my research part in a way audience see the whole landscape of my search and my argument exist independently.
Focus on education
The audiences were particularly excited to see how I apply technology to education. Maybe the presentation is structured for them to be expecting to see that. Well, either way I am also excited go to this path. Making playful learning experience with physical movement and information. Wow, this is a lot of narrowing down. I’ve made a big decision in my thesis.
Strengthen the argument with supportive materials
Parents audience are often against my thesis because they do not want their kids to be around technology what so ever. I want to make my thesis that compromise the parent’s group.
Plan for Final of My Thesis
The main goal in my thesis is to create works that shows my design ability to start my career as user experience designers. In order to do that I need to make high quality works that are coherence as a whole and having in-depth research and processes including user test, prototyping, impact. Here is my plans to achieve that.
I will write 2 blogs every week. One for tracking. The other for reach and catching up.
Build Relationship with People and Community (for user test and model)
- places to volunteer
- organization, program
- Friends (blog and ask via emails with the link)
- Find model earlier(internet and friends)
Main 3 works related to UX/UI
- VR/AR experience
Subject Narrow Down
Narrow down to "Learn Through Spontaneous Experience"